I am confused by the "blows around smoke versus puts out the fire" comment. A number of good research studies have shown that theoretical orientation contributes only about 15% to therapeutic efficacy. Given this research, I would think it would be difficult to prove that an Adlerian background would be much more effective that a Solution Focused background. It seems that somehow we might lose sight of the client when we hold fast to theoretical abstractions. Can you show me where I have gone wrong?